
STRANDS
Extended Learning Opportunities
Strands explore specific educational topics in
depth through a series of conceptually and developmentally linked
sequential sessions. Discuss these important topics with experts in the
field! Convention attendees may elect to attend all strand sessions or
one or two sessions of a strand. When you attend all sessions of a
strand, you are eligible to earn CEUs!
Supporting
the Next Generation of Teachers for Collaboration: The Intersection of
Teacher Preparation and School Practice
Universal
Design for Learning: Tipping Points from Research to Practice
Differentiating
Instructional Practices—the Key to Curriculum Access for All
Students
Sustaining
and Scaling the Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and
Supports (PBIS): Systems and Applications
Using
Differentiated Instruction With Culturally Responsive Teaching:
Marriage, Merger, and Partnership
The
Content Literacy Continuum: A Framework for Implementing a Continuum of
Literacy Supports in Secondary Schools
Identifying
and Using Effective Practices With Children and Youth With Autism
Spectrum Disorders
Dropout
Prevention for Students With Disabilities
Family
Collaboration in the Context of Diversity: Building Cultural
Connections
Thursday,
April 3
STRAND A: Supporting the Next Generation
of Teachers for Collaboration: The Intersection of Teacher Preparation
and School Practice
| Leaders: |
Marleen C. Pugach,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Linda P. Blanton,
Florida International University, Miami |
Strand Overview: The focus of this strand is
twofold: (1) How teacher preparation might be structured to prepare all
teachers to work effectively with students who have disabilities and (2)
how teacher preparation intersects with school practices and the
professional development of teachers. Strand leaders will explore
the topics of teacher preparation and school practice as each relates to
(1) the high number of students with disabilities who receive much of
their education in general education classrooms; (2) the joint demands
of IDEA and NCLB that require new and practicing teachers to be highly
qualified, especially the demand for special education teachers to be
qualified in academic content areas; and (3) the simultaneous shortage
of special education teachers. This strand is designed to provide
participants with a view of teacher preparation that is situated within
the practice of inclusive education and that is responsive to the
ongoing connection between the preparation of new teachers and the
quality of practice in the schools.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
-
Define and describe the major characteristics of dominant models of
collaborative teacher education.
-
Define and describe the direct relationship between teacher
education and school practice.
-
Identify the pros and cons of requiring special education teachers
to earn a general education license before they earn a special education
license as a way of addressing the requirement for highly qualified
teachers.
Session 1—8:30-10:30 a.m.
Session 2—1:15-3:15 p.m.
Session 3—3:45-5:45 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Thursday,
April 3
STRAND B: Universal Design for
Learning: Tipping Points from Research to Practice
|
Leaders:
|
David Rose and Tracey Hall, Center
for Applied Special Technology (CAST), Wakefield, MA
|
Strand Overview: Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
provides multiple paths and support for all learners to gain knowledge,
skills, and enthusiasm for learning. Specifically, UDL embeds
evidence-based practices, particularly those which have been shown to be
effective for students with disabilities, directly into core
instructional materials and methods.
A UDL curriculum offers rich supports for learning (often
technology-based) so that they are more “universally”
available to students with and without disabilities at the time of
instruction. In doing so, UDL reduces barriers to learning while
maintaining high achievement standards for all.
In recent years, UDL has become part of education’s everyday
lexicon, especially with regard to students with disabilities, and a
number of states have begun UDL initiatives. Yet many misconceptions
remain.
The presentations in this strand will examine the intersection of UDL
research and practice across K-12 and postsecondary grades, content
areas, and states.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
-
Understand how UDL supports and sustains efforts to personalize
instruction for all students--learners with and without
disabilities.
-
Grasp the research fundamentals of UDL.
-
Identify practical strategies and tools for classroom
implementation.
Session 1—8:30–9:30 a.m.
Session 2—9:45-10:45 a.m.
Session 3—11:00 a.m.-noon
Session 4—1:15-2:15 p.m.
Session 5—2:30-3:30 p.m.
Session 6—3:45-4:45 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Thursday,
April 3
– continues on –
Friday, April 4
STRAND C: Differentiating Instructional
Practices—the Key to Curriculum Access for All
Students
| Leaders: |
Nancy Safer and
Renee Sherman, American Institutes for Research,
Washington, DC |
Strand Overview: Over the past five years the
federally funded Access Center has identified a variety of
evidence-based practices designed to help students with disabilities
access the general education curriculum and to improve student outcomes
for all students. Participants will sample activities from four
separate modules developed by the Center: Differentiated Instruction;
Math and Science Strategies; Effective Reading Interventions; and
Co-Teaching Strategies and receive copies of these modules. Strand
sessions will focus on: (1) research-supported interventions that
teachers can use to differentiate instructions and improve access, (2)
modules developed by the Center that can be used in preservice and
inservice programs to teach the principles of differentiating
instruction in key curricular areas and co-teaching, (3) resources and
documents that are available through the Access Center Web site to
assist educators to meet their goals to ensure that all students
progress and master the general education curriculum.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
- Identify evidence-based instructional practices and how they can be
applied to particular content areas with the goal of enabling all
students to succeed in the general education curriculum.
- Understand the principles of differentiated instruction and be able
to implement several differentiation strategies.
- Apply several strategies enabling students with disabilities to
access complex math and science content.
- Understand the essential components of reading and effective
instructional strategies for each component.
- Identify the various models of co-teaching and how to select the
model most beneficial for particular settings and students.
Thursday
Session 1—1:15-3:15 p.m.
Session 2—3:45-5:45 p.m.
continues on Friday
Session 3—8:30-10:30 a.m.
Session 4—1:15-3:15 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Friday,
April 4
STRAND D: Sustaining and Scaling the
Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS):
Systems and Applications
| Leaders: |
Rob Horner, National
Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, University of
Oregon, Eugene and George Sugai, National Center on
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, University of
Connecticut, Storrs |
Strand Overview: This strand will describe features
and examples of large scale implementation of positive behavioral
interventions and supports. Organizational and coordination guidelines
for sustaining and scaling up accurate implementation across districts
and schools and maintaining progress improvement will be emphasized.
Examples, research, and evaluation data will be presented to support and
inform the use of these guidelines. In addition, practical applications,
guidelines, and examples will be provided.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
-
Describe features of, guidelines for, and lessons learned from
sustaining, scaling-up, and evaluating the implementation of district
and statewide schoolwide positive behavioral supports (SWPBS).
-
Describe how implementation of SWPBS includes features of a
responsiveness-to-intervention approach.
-
Describe features of and guidelines for implementation of secondary
and tertiary tier intervention practices and systems.
Session 1—8:30–9:30 a.m.
Session 2—9:45-11:45 a.m.
Session 3—1:15-3:15 p.m.
Session 4—3:45-4:45 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Friday,
April 4
STRAND E: Using Differentiated
Instruction With Culturally Responsive Teaching: Marriage, Merger, and
Partnership
| Leaders: |
Gloria D.
Campbell-Whatley, University of North Carolina, Charlotte and
Marva Gavins-Williams, Pfeiffer University,
Misenheimer, NC |
Strand Overview: In the height of standards-based
reform, special education teachers must link outcomes for students with
disabilities to the general education curriculum. However, culture and
language must be considered when planning specialized instructional
activities for students from diverse backgrounds. Using differentiated
instruction across all content area curricula expands the traditional
models of instruction to address the unique learning styles of
culturally and linguistically diverse learners in special education
classes. Based on multiple intelligences, differentiated
instruction offers educators an array of instructional options for
teaching nontraditional learners. This strand will offer practical,
creative, and insightful ideas. In addition, solutions for six students
with various characteristics and profiles will be presented and audience
participation will be encouraged.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
-
Identify recommendations for culturally sensitive instructional
practices.
-
Identify efficient and effective ways to identify student-learning
styles.
-
Incorporate differentiated instruction within culturally responsive
instruction in 5 sample lesson plans.
-
Develop small group demonstrations given 5 reflective
activities.
-
Develop differentiated instructional strategies.
Session 1—8:30–9:30 a.m.
Session 2—9:45-10:45 a.m.
Session 3—11:00 a.m.-noon
Session 4—1:15-2:15 p.m.
Session 5—2:30-3:30 p.m.
Session 6—3:45-4:45 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Friday,
April 4
STRAND F: The Content Literacy
Continuum: A Framework for Implementing a Continuum of Literacy Supports
in Secondary Schools
| Leaders: |
Don Deshler, University
of Kansas, Lawrence |
Strand Overview: This strand will address structural
and instructional issues for improving literacy outcomes for adolescent
learners. Specifically, the strand will describe the Content Literacy
Continuum, a tiered-intervention model, and how it can be used in middle
and high school settings to meet students’ varying literacy
needs. Presenters will discuss strategies for creating support at
the district and building level, the role of literacy coaches, specific
strategies for instruction, and considerations for program
evaluation.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
-
Discuss the Content Literacy Continuum and strategies for
implementation in middle and secondary schools.
-
Create systems at the district and building level that support
literacy initiatives.
-
Develop and implement instructional units using Content Enhancement
Routines.
-
Evaluate the success of schoolwide literacy initiatives.
Session 1—8:30–9:30 a.m.
Session 2—9:45-10:45 a.m.
Session 3—11:00 a.m.-noon
Session 4—1:15-2:15 p.m.
Session 5—2:30-3:30 p.m.
Session 6—3:45-4:45 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Saturday,
April 5
STRAND G: Identifying and Using
Effective Practices With Children and Youth With Autism Spectrum
Disorders
| Leaders: |
Richard L. Simpson,
University of Kansas, Lawrence |
Strand Overview: This strand will assist
professionals to identify and correctly use research-based, maximally
effective treatment and intervention strategies that have the best
possibility of bringing about positive outcomes for learners with autism
spectrum disorders (ASD). Sessions within the strand will present
and discuss the selection, application, and evaluation of strategies and
methods essential to the education of learners with ASD, including
communication/language, social skill and social interaction instruction,
behavior management, environmental supports, and
self-determination. Practical and utilitarian program guidelines
and methods will be elements of each presentation.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
-
Recognize the need for evidence-based methods for students with
ASD.
-
Identify effective practice interventions and treatments for
students with ASD.
-
Understand policy, scientific and educational methodology
decision-making considerations and guidelines related to educating
students with ASD.
Session 1—8:30–9:30 a.m.
Session 2—9:45-10:45 a.m.
Session 3—11:00 a.m.-noon
Session 4—1:15-2:15 p.m.
Session 5—2:30-3:30 p.m.
Session 6—3:45-4:45 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Saturday,
April 5
STRAND H: Dropout Prevention for
Students With Disabilities
| Leaders: |
LouJeania Bost,
Louise Kennelly, and Joseph Harris,
National Dropout Prevention Center for Students With Disabilities,
Washington, DC |
Strand Overview: Far too many high school students
drop out of school long before graduation day. Nationwide it is reported
that only about 74% of students graduate from high school and only about
half of Black and Latino students graduate. Compounding the issue of
high school dropout rates is that many of these students also have
disabilities. Given that students with disabilities drop out of school
at over twice the rate of their same-age peers, state and local
education agencies are in need of dropout prevention interventions that
yield positive results. This strand will highlight effective,
research-based strategies that school systems can readily undertake to
identify likely dropouts so that they can intervene with support before
it’s too late. The first panel examines the initial step toward an
effective dropout prevention policy: tracking and analyzing basic data
to identify students who show early warning signs of dropping out. The
key indicators include: poor grades in core subjects; low attendance,
including missing 10 days of the first 30 days of high school; failure
to be promoted to the next grade; and disengagement in the classroom,
including behavioral problems. A second panel investigates a variety of
best practices and proven strategies used to stem dropout (e.g.,
behavior and attendance monitoring, Response to Intervention, tutoring,
community engagement, and programs addressing high school transitions),
and also provides policy makers, practitioners, educators, and teachers
with strategies to combat the dropout problem. Concrete examples of
these proven strategies are provided as the third session examines how
Minneapolis and New Hampshire are successfully implementing dropout
prevention initiatives that promote advancement for students with
disabilities.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants will be able
to:
-
Identify the characteristics of students who are at a higher risk
for dropping out.
-
Understand different proven programs and strategies that can be
used to identify and stem likely dropouts.
-
Discuss how dropout prevention policies are helping students
with disabilities in some states and be able to take this information
back to their states for further use.
Session 1—8:30–9:30 a.m.
Session 2—9:45-10:45 a.m.
Session 3—11:00 a.m.-noon
Session 4—1:15-2:15 p.m.
Back to top ↑
Saturday,
April 5
STRAND I: Parents & Families Family Collaboration
in the Context of Diversity: Building Cultural
Connections
Leader: Elizabeth
Harry, University of Miami, FL
Strand Overview: Families from diverse
cultures, ethnicities, and languages express a range of cultural models.
This strand will provide participants with research-based insights into
the importance of understanding the role of culture in differential
beliefs about family structures, family interactions, and parental goals
for children. Presenters will discuss evidence and guidelines from
schools that have utilized exemplary strategies toward responding to the
kinds of family involvement needs expressed in the research. Presenters
will include a broad range of stakeholders, including parents, school
administrators, and researchers. Participants will gain direct
information from family members of children and youth with disabilities
who have achieved various levels of success in a range of areas
regarding what worked for their children. The presenters will propose a
clear, forward-looking agenda for research with traditionally
under-represented families, guidelines for equity in the assessment and
placement process, and insights into the impact of legal and regulatory
policies on parent involvement. Recommendations for improvement of both
research and practice and the connection between the two will be
discussed.
At the conclusion of this strand, participants
will be able to:
-
Understand the role of culture in family interactions
and goals for their children.
-
Discuss specific strategies for improving school
climate, parental involvement, & effective administration of special
education policies.
-
Describe recommendations for improving research and
practice
Session 1—9:45-10:45 a.m.
Session 2—11:00 a.m.-noon
Session 3—1:15-2:15 p.m.
Session 4—2:30-3:30 p.m.
Back to top ↑
|